IMPEACH GEORGE BUSH!! The Bulldog Manifesto Some Positive Signs From the Right...And Then a Few Words on Dick Cheney - The Bulldog Manifesto

« Home | The Struggle Continues.... James Dobson. Ideologi... » | What is a Patriot? » | The Struggle Against Ideological Extremists Rolls ... » | The Struggle Against Ideological Extremists Rolls ... » | The Struggle Against the Ideological Extremists...... » | And Finally, #5...... » | South Carolina....the Next "Terrorist" Target? » | Bush's Kempf » | Misconceptions Relating to Fascism » | Fourteen Characteristics of Fascism » 

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

Some Positive Signs From the Right...And Then a Few Words on Dick Cheney

There are definite signs that the Right is fracturing between the Paleocons (traditional conservatives) and the Neocons (Neoconservatives). Halleluyah!

It seems as if the Paleocons are coming to realize that the Neocons are bad for America. The likes of Pat Buchanan and Paul Craig Roberts (former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan) have joined with some in the middle in openly ripping apart the Neocon agenda. Take a look at the Neoconwatch blog. There you will find an assortment of people who are openly discussing the lies and war crimes committed by the Neocons.

The world has changed so much in the past five years, that Pat Buchanan is starting to look like a moderate! And Paul Craig Roberts, listed by Who’s Who in America as one of the 1,000 most influential political thinkers in the world, has evolved into a major Bush critic. As he says, he hasn't abandoned the Republican party, he "just can’t respect a party leadership who doesn’t respect the truth."

Some of the posters on Neoconwatch also believe, as I do, that the Bush administration was responsible for 9/11. Its nice to see people coming around. BUt wait.....

CHENEY ALERT! CHENEY ALERT!

If you haven't heard, The American Conservative reported in its print edition that:
"The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Dick Cheney's office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option."
Check out this article by the American Free Press.

Isn't it strange that Cheney is preparing a nuclear attack against Iran and Iran hasn't even done anything? Oh wait, wasn't there a plan for invading Afghanistan already on George W. Bush's table prior 9/11? Perhaps its time to cue the next "terrorist" attack?

With Bush in Crawford, Congress on vacation, and Cheney running the show, what better time for Cheney to work his magic?

E-mail this post



Remember me (?)



All personal information that you provide here will be governed by the Privacy Policy of Blogger.com. More...

This is damn scary.

Your right Bulldog, it's much better to never have any plans for "what if". We should only react after somethign happens.

I think the point Bulldog was trying to make Vulture, is that it sounds like Cheney is going to have a plan to attack Iran and will do so in the event there is another terrorist event, EVEN IF Iran is in NO WAY involved. Of course I don't want to put words the Bulldog's mouth.

vulture 6,

You don't get it. Every time we've had a newly created "what if" plan in the Bush Administration, it hasn't been long before its been enacted. Afghanistan, Iraq, and possibly Iran.

If you can't tell how Bush Inc has manipulated a series of wars, then I'm afraid this will escape you too.

Check out this article by staunch conservative Pat Buchanan

Iran has threatened us and are a source of the "insurgents".

Doesn't matter, Israel will take care of the problem anyway.

John,

Please provide us with some evidence (other than an article from the administration's online propoganda machine WorldNetDaily) that:

1. Iran has threatened the USA recently
2. That Iran is the "source" of the insurgents.

I'm amazed at how some people buy this crap so unflinchingly. They sold you a bill of goods in Iraq, and yet you still believe them in Iran? What does it take to wake up?

Pat Buchanan a moderate? Holy crap, where the hell did Iput my noose?

Oh, yea, just let Iran finish their nukes so they can take control of the middle east right? Say goobye to Israel and hello to armaggedon.

Typical illogic from the left.

OTTMANN,

Are you aware that this story originated from Air Force pilots who fear that Cheney is already intent on using nukes against Iran? How does this not scare you?

Typical illogic and brainwashed support of the President from the right.

You forgot Rove wiping Bush's ass. No Joke!

You said, "Some of the posters on Neoconwatch also believe, as I do, that the Bush administration was responsible for 9/11. Its nice to see people coming around. BUt wait.."

Please provide us with some evidence to prove your point. The GWB Admin was only in office technically from Jan 20th 2000 to Sept 10th 2000. And during that time many of GWB's top level folks weren't installed until a few months AFTER January 20th, so how do you claim that GWB created 9/11.

Do you care to back up YOUR points? Or will you give some sorry attack on my character to distract the people from what you just said? It takes some evidence for you to indict a President of causing an attack so big as 9/11.

Do you care to ante up?

insane hippie,

Your reading comprehension skills are lacking. Notice I stated my belief. I did not state it as fact! There is a difference. I've been very clear on this blog that I do not have all of the answers re: 9/11, but I do believe, as do many others, that there are plenty of very revealing questions re: 9/11. And certainly, the attempted cover-up sure doesnt help.

I suggest you acquaint yourself with my prior blog posts. I'm not about to recount a bunch of posts to dispute one point with you, especially where that point is based on opinion, not fact.

Stick around, I'll be sure to discuss 9/11 some more. I strongly suggest you look into it yourself. Every American should. For starters, take a look at:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8765.htm

Also take a look at Hijacking Catastrophe.

There are so many places to look really. I suggest you open your mind, use your google.com, and go looking. Be skeptical of everythig you read, but keep an open mind. There is certainly a lot of bullshit out there in the conspiracy theory world, but there certainly are points that cannot be disputed. Do whatever you wish, the choice is yours.

doesn't surprise me. they lied to get into vietnam why not kill innocents so bush could make daddy proud.

This is a good sign. Two things have always made me suspicious of Bush's handling of 9/11.

A) I know for a fact that Clinton WARNED Bush about Osama and company when Bush took office. Clinton had been pursuing Osama actively for years.

B) Because Bush is documented to have reallocated resources shortly after taking office from pursuing Al-Qaeda to investigating an Iraq invasion, does this mean he KNEW about the 9/11 plot but deemed it a minor threat?

Both of these well-documented facts lead to well justified fears. No matter how we look at this, it points to Bush being to blame for 9/11. Did he let it happen intentionally or did it happen because he was too busy taking Saddam down to worry about the pesky terrorist threat? Bush has far more guilt in this than most are aware of.

New blog launched to expose the disreputable and dishonest American Bulldog breeders and kennels.

If you have a "horror story" when dealing with an American Bull Dog breeder or kennel PLEASE share it with us at http://americanbulldogblog.blogspot.com/

By doing so you will be providing valuable information to potential puppy buyers and help them avoid similar situation.

This is damn scary.

Your right Bulldog, it's much better to never have any plans for "what if". We should only react after somethign happens.

I think the point Bulldog was trying to make Vulture, is that it sounds like Cheney is going to have a plan to attack Iran and will do so in the event there is another terrorist event, EVEN IF Iran is in NO WAY involved. Of course I don't want to put words the Bulldog's mouth.

vulture 6,

You don't get it. Every time we've had a newly created "what if" plan in the Bush Administration, it hasn't been long before its been enacted. Afghanistan, Iraq, and possibly Iran.

If you can't tell how Bush Inc has manipulated a series of wars, then I'm afraid this will escape you too.

Check out this article by staunch conservative Pat Buchanan

Iran has threatened us and are a source of the "insurgents".

Doesn't matter, Israel will take care of the problem anyway.

John,

Please provide us with some evidence (other than an article from the administration's online propoganda machine WorldNetDaily) that:

1. Iran has threatened the USA recently
2. That Iran is the "source" of the insurgents.

I'm amazed at how some people buy this crap so unflinchingly. They sold you a bill of goods in Iraq, and yet you still believe them in Iran? What does it take to wake up?

Pat Buchanan a moderate? Holy crap, where the hell did Iput my noose?

Oh, yea, just let Iran finish their nukes so they can take control of the middle east right? Say goobye to Israel and hello to armaggedon.

Typical illogic from the left.

OTTMANN,

Are you aware that this story originated from Air Force pilots who fear that Cheney is already intent on using nukes against Iran? How does this not scare you?

Typical illogic and brainwashed support of the President from the right.

You forgot Rove wiping Bush's ass. No Joke!

You said, "Some of the posters on Neoconwatch also believe, as I do, that the Bush administration was responsible for 9/11. Its nice to see people coming around. BUt wait.."

Please provide us with some evidence to prove your point. The GWB Admin was only in office technically from Jan 20th 2000 to Sept 10th 2000. And during that time many of GWB's top level folks weren't installed until a few months AFTER January 20th, so how do you claim that GWB created 9/11.

Do you care to back up YOUR points? Or will you give some sorry attack on my character to distract the people from what you just said? It takes some evidence for you to indict a President of causing an attack so big as 9/11.

Do you care to ante up?

insane hippie,

Your reading comprehension skills are lacking. Notice I stated my belief. I did not state it as fact! There is a difference. I've been very clear on this blog that I do not have all of the answers re: 9/11, but I do believe, as do many others, that there are plenty of very revealing questions re: 9/11. And certainly, the attempted cover-up sure doesnt help.

I suggest you acquaint yourself with my prior blog posts. I'm not about to recount a bunch of posts to dispute one point with you, especially where that point is based on opinion, not fact.

Stick around, I'll be sure to discuss 9/11 some more. I strongly suggest you look into it yourself. Every American should. For starters, take a look at:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8765.htm

Also take a look at Hijacking Catastrophe.

There are so many places to look really. I suggest you open your mind, use your google.com, and go looking. Be skeptical of everythig you read, but keep an open mind. There is certainly a lot of bullshit out there in the conspiracy theory world, but there certainly are points that cannot be disputed. Do whatever you wish, the choice is yours.

doesn't surprise me. they lied to get into vietnam why not kill innocents so bush could make daddy proud.

This is a good sign. Two things have always made me suspicious of Bush's handling of 9/11.

A) I know for a fact that Clinton WARNED Bush about Osama and company when Bush took office. Clinton had been pursuing Osama actively for years.

B) Because Bush is documented to have reallocated resources shortly after taking office from pursuing Al-Qaeda to investigating an Iraq invasion, does this mean he KNEW about the 9/11 plot but deemed it a minor threat?

Both of these well-documented facts lead to well justified fears. No matter how we look at this, it points to Bush being to blame for 9/11. Did he let it happen intentionally or did it happen because he was too busy taking Saddam down to worry about the pesky terrorist threat? Bush has far more guilt in this than most are aware of.

New blog launched to expose the disreputable and dishonest American Bulldog breeders and kennels.

If you have a "horror story" when dealing with an American Bull Dog breeder or kennel PLEASE share it with us at http://americanbulldogblog.blogspot.com/

By doing so you will be providing valuable information to potential puppy buyers and help them avoid similar situation.

Add a comment

 
All Bark. No Bite.
The Bulldog Manifesto


Headlines from the Impeachment 

Blogosphere
Provided by First Sustainable
Add this box to your site
Add your feed to this box




The Dog House