IMPEACH GEORGE BUSH!! The Bulldog Manifesto And Finally, #5...... - The Bulldog Manifesto

« Home | South Carolina....the Next "Terrorist" Target? » | Bush's Kempf » | Misconceptions Relating to Fascism » | Fourteen Characteristics of Fascism » | The Security Fallacy and the War Profiteers » | Some More 9/11 Facts » | More From the Fascists..... » | Iraq and Iran -- The Lovefest Continues » | George W. Bush's Confidential Order 119i-WF-213589... » | 9/11 and Five Major Coincidences » 

Sunday, July 31, 2005

And Finally, #5......

You may recall last week when I posted about "Some More 9/11 Facts" that I intentionally cut myself short of discussing fact #5.

Well, here goes:

#5. No steel building in history has collapsed from fire damage apart from those buildings lost on 9/11. Yeah, I know what your response is, 'how many other steel buildings have been hit by commercial aircrafts filled with jet fuel?' Fair enough, but lets consider ALL OF THE FACTS before we simply assume that jet fuel + collision = completely collapsed building.

Like everyone else, I watched the planes hit the World Trade Center towers and then watched with sheer horror how the buildings collapsed straight down. Like everyone else, I believed the impact from the planes and the ensuing fires caused the collapses. But now, after much information has been revealed, I'm not so sure. Consider all of this:

a. Did you know that, in order for a building to collapse straight down, all of the load bearing elements of the building must fail at exactly the same time? Its just simple physics. If all of the load bearing elements do not fail at the exact same time, the building will simply tip over to one side. (As pictured in the image to the right and the image above left)

b. Did you know that Building 7 of the WTC, a 47 story steel structure, was not hit by any airplane but nonetheless collapsed...straight down. (See image to the left, that is WTC 7 collapsing straight down) The building was only on fire for 1 to 2 hours! (And remember, this building was not hit by any plane. It was far away from the towers.) This was the same building that housed offices for the CIA, Department of Defense, Office of the Mayor, FEMA, and a host of other curious tenants. Please check this out.

This is what Dan Rather of CBS News said "live" on the air immediately after building 7 fell down:
“Amazing, incredible pick your word. For the third time today, it’s reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.” (See Video here)

c. Did you know that FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) stated in May of 2002 that "the specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME." (See here, Chapter 5, Page 31 of the FEMA Report)

d. Yet, WTC 7's owner, Larry Silverstein, admitted on PBS that the building was intentionally pulled down. Check this out. So why does FEMA report that the cause of building 7's collapse is "unknown at this time"? Certainly they should have known that it was pulled down intentionally, right? And lets just say that Larry Silverstein, the building's owner is lying, then how the heck do they account for the fact that the building fell straight down after only being on fire (moderate fire) for 1 to 2 hours?

As far as WTC 7 goes, there is something very, very, very fishy about that collapse. Either the owner is lying or FEMA is lying. And consider this, in order for that building to have been intentionally pulled, that building would have had to have been fitted with explosives. There was only one hour between the time WTC was completely evacuated and the time the building collapsed. Unless, of course, the building was fitted ahead of time.

e. Did you know that Fire Engineering Magazine, the premier firefighter trade magazine for over 122 years, stated the following in January of 2002:
"Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation" blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure"


f. Did you know that all of the evidence, including the structural steel within the towers, was "cut up and sold for scrap" to China. This occurred almost immediately after the towers collapsed. They never bothered to examine the steel. What kind of investigation could there have been without, at the minimum, examining the wreckage? Wouldn't it have been useful, simply from a design perspective to examine the "hows" and "whys" of the collapse?
"Such destruction of evidence shows the astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough, scientific investigation of the largest fire-induced collapse in world history. I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall." (Fire Engineering Magazine (January 4, 2002)


g. Did you know that, according to an AP article, only $600,000 was spent investigating the WTC towers collapse. The 9/11 Commission spent $15 million dollars in its entire investigation. (Compare that with the $65 million spent investigating Clinton's "affairs").

h. The prevailing theory holds that the WTC towers collapsed because the jet fuel within the planes burned so hot that it caused the steel within the WTC towers to melt, therefore causing the building to collapse. Now, even if we assume this is true, in order for the towers to collapse straight down, the steel would have had to have been compromised equally on all four corners of the building and within the four corners of the interior support columns. So if the fire raging within the towers was burning hot enough to compromise the steel (800 degrees Celsius), how come there are clear photographs of people standing in the burnt out areas of the crash? (See image to the right: Notice the woman standing in a burnt out area of the WTC tower. If its hot enough to bend steel, how the heck is she not incinerated?)

i. Did you know that prior to the collapse of South Tower, whereas floors 78-84 were alleged to have been "ravaged by an 800 degree Celsius inferno", there were firefighters on the 78th floor who were calmly preparing to move up to the 79th floor? Here is a transcript of their radio transmission:
Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that, 78th floor numerous 10-45 Code Ones.

Ladder 15: "Chief, what stair you in?"

Battalion Seven Chief: "South stairway Adam, South Tower."

Ladder 15: "Floor 78?"

Battalion Seven Chief: "Ten-four, numerous civilians, we gonna need two engines up here."

Battalion Seven Chief: "Tower one. Battalion Seven to Ladder 15."

Battalion Seven Chief: "I'm going to need two of your firefighters Adam stairway to knock down two fires. We have a house line stretched we could use some water on it, knock it down, okay."

Ladder 15: "Alright ten-four, we're coming up the stairs. We're on 77 now in the B stair, I'll be right to you."

Battalion Seven Operations Tower One: "Battalion Seven Operations Tower One to Battalion Nine, need you on floor above 79. We have access stairs going up to 79, kay."

Battalion Nine: "Alright, I'm on my way up Orio."


j. Did you know that, for well over a year, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey refused to release the audiotape of firefighters' communications from the World Trade Center during the September 11 attacks?

k. Did you know that seismographs at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., 21 miles north of the WTC, recorded strange seismic activity on Sept. 11 that has still not been explained? While the aircraft crashes caused minimal earth shaking, significant earthquakes with unusual spikes occurred at the beginning of each collapse. The Palisades seismic data recorded a 2.1 magnitude earthquake during the 10-second collapse of the South Tower at 9:59:04 and a 2.3 quake during the 8-second collapse of the North Tower at 10:28:31. However, the Palisades seismic record shows that—as the collapses began—a huge seismic “spike” marked the moment the greatest energy went into the ground. The strongest jolts were all registered at the beginning of the collapses, well before the falling debris struck the Earth. (Check out this article)

l. Did you know that many witnesses, including firemen inside the building, reported "secondary explosions" prior to the collapse of each of the towers? One of the first firefighters in the stricken second tower, Louie Cacchioli, 51, told People Weekly on Sept. 24: "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building." (I'm not going to post all of these claims, I simply suggest you go look for yourself...there are too many! But if you wish, you can check out this video of firefighters talking about the explosions.)

m. Did you know that "somehow" people were warned ahead of time that the first tower would collapse, even though prior to the first collapse, there was no reason to believe that the tower would collapse (remember, until the first tower collapsed, no modern steel building had ever collapsed due to fire...ever!!)? Check out this video

n. Did you know that in February of 2005, a 32 story steel skyscraper in Madrid, Spain (the Windsor Building) burned for days at temperatures nearing 800 degrees Celsius, yet that building, which was constructed in 1973, did what most steel buildings do when they are on fire...it simply burned. It did not collapse. Compare that with what happened to WTC 7, a building which did NOT get hit by a plane, and a building that only burned for a few hours. WTC 7 collapsed straight down!

For more info and photos on the Windsor Building fire, check this out.

Well, I could go on, but I think I've given you a lot for one sitting. :-)Like I've said before, the real conspiracy theory is the one perpetrated by the government. Sorry, but I'm not buying it at all!

E-mail this post



Remember me (?)



All personal information that you provide here will be governed by the Privacy Policy of Blogger.com. More...

Things like this never cease to amaze me. I always take an interest in the other side to the story we don't seemingly hear. And yet we surely have the right to? Before reading your writings and references, I'd never considered that the damage etc. was caused by more than the two planes. I've certainly had my eyes opened.
Thanks.
Take care. x

I knew this facts already. And of course there are many more of them, and a lot of fair websites around that explain them. They're creepy facts and they keep being creepy every new time I read about them. Well, let's say it (People as Gore Vidal said it just right after september 2001): 11/9 and possibly all the war-on-terrorism it's all an inside job. White House, CIA, Western secret agencies, Mossad, arabic, oriental accomplices and God knows who else made it.
Will they ever pay for it? May be. May be not.
It gives me the creep to think that maybe even in one hundred years from now the truth wont' be revealed.

You're doing fine with this blog anyway. I'll keep read it. (Too bad for the ads though)-

Great stuff! I've been reading your articles for a while now and I like them because they go into more depth on someof the issues that come up on The Rudicus Report.

I espcially like what you did here with this article - good compilation - you should send it over to Raw Story - I bet they'd get a kick out of it.

We should trade links, I think our respective readers would enjoy each others sites. Keep up the great work!

This is fascinating ... I need to blogmark you and come back, then really delve in.

Are you implying that the persons responsible for the attacks of September 11 could have been agents of the United States government willing to sacrifice their lives in the name of George W. Bush and Karl Rove, conspirators?

I love your blog. You've made some incredible arguments and stated clear and concise facts. Here's hoping the Men In Black don't show up on your door and "disappear" you.

Ok, Mulder.

makes you think, dont it?

corpodibacco,

I decided to take out many of the advertisements. Now, there are only three remaining. The blog should load much quicker now.

I'm thinking about doing entirely away with all advertisements, but she shall see.

I hope it loads faster for you now.

Your writing is very well researched, and for that I applaud you. The manner in which you have attempted to gainsay the official version of the incident is remarkable, as also very cogent, and really lives up to the true purpose of the World Wide Web, which is to present different versions of the same basic truth. Keep up the good work.

I have a question~ if this were true, were the people who flew into the building, who were they working for? the government? cia? What would be the point and the gain?

Very interested in your blog, will definately blogmark!

Your points seem very well thought out and address some good points. The picture evidence and links give credence to what you're saying. Good post.

izabella,

Ask yourself? Who has gained the most from 9/11? The military industrial complex, including, George W. Bush's Carlyle Group, Cheney's Halliburton, and George Schultz's Bechtel.

And dont forget about their Big Oil friends who will make out nicely with the newly formed Iraqi government and the new Afghanistan oil and natural gas pipeline. (Did you know that Afghan president Hamid Kharzai is a former Unocal executive? So was Condoleeza Rice, by the way.)

The CIA is merely the "muscle" for our gangsters in office. They get to use our military, CIA, and the rest of our government agencies to further their own causes. Its quite a nice scam. And its been going on for over a hundred years.

Do a google search for the name General Smedley Butler. And remember, General Butler was the highest decorated General this country had ever seen at the time of his retirement. After he retired, he talked a lot about how the US military was used.

Brilliant. Thank you for this.

Very interesting article. Keep it up.

Can't say I agree, but fascinating stuff nonetheless.

Very intresting and you use facts to back it up. You have hlped open my eyes. Like the rest of you blog too by the way.

The BushCo/NWO is behind all of this. The people need to say enough is enough!

They planned to manipulate public opinion for a war in Iraq using terrorism and the threat of WMD's and that is exactly what they did.
Now it's time for the American people to stand up and be counted.
They've got to be held accountable by all that's left-WE, THE PEOPLE!

Have you considered the different architectural skeletal structure of the Twin Towers in their collapse?

Mr. Shott,

But of course. In fact, thats what makes the collapse even more curious. There have been a few reports based upon theories (after all, since the evidence was destroyed, all we are left with in terms of the structural analysis is deduction) conducted by structural engineers which completely discredit the "pancake theory".

Also, the very fact that the towers collapsed at terminal velocity further leads one to believe that towers did not come down due to mere fire.

Check this out. Its simply a very layman's approach to understanding the free fall problem:

http://911blimp.net/prf_FreeFallPhysics.shtml

the best article on the collapses is at

http://911research.wtc7.net

the "blimp" site is one that is best to avoid, there's a mixture of real and fake information there

for other reliable sites

911review.com
cooperativeresearch.org
fromthewilderness.com
oilempire.us
ratical.org
septembereleventh.org

there are others, but these are among the very best and most careful

lots of claims are not real -- yes, there was complicity, but there's also a big smokescreen of disinfo surrounding the evidence that is hard to separate from real material that can be independently verified

wow...conspiracy or not, i guessed if there is anohter side of the story, it is worth reading/hearing!

Holy horseshit, do I ever love this site. You'd better believe I blogrolled it. Keep up the good (but creepy - the facts about WTC 7 are still giving me goosebumps) work!

First thing I thought when I was watching the towers fall was what an incredibly well orchestrated controlled demolition and wondered who did it because the planes clearly didn't. Then I was shocked that people threw aside logic so quickly...a handy thing for an administration with an agenda. Yes, of course Bush didn't seem surprised to "get the news" about the attacks. How can you be surprised about something you already know? Loved your blog.

Reopen 911 website offers a ton of info not covered by the 9-11 Commission Report.

A Free DVD is offered with much of the information listed in this post.

I agree with the 7th tower analyst to the extent it is explained. It leads to the conclusion that many of New York's buildings might have a self-destruct bombs in place so that the buildings can be destroyed orderly before they can topple to the side and therefore taking out even more buildings.
I disagree that this is what happened with the two man towers. They did not fall straight down. They started collapsing from near the impact points and fell outwards and inwards at the same time. Plus, I've seen the fire department video that was taken in the ground floor the first tower when the collapse started, and there are not signs of cutter explosions. Plus, to my knowledge, none of the firefighters that did survive in the lower underground levels reported anything that could be called a cutter explosion. Basically, when I watched the two towers fall live, I didn't see anything organized about it at all. Also, it wasn't the fuel fire that is blamed for the collapse, it is the massive paper fire the started burning from the fuel fire, and it was the paper fire that picked up momentum long after the fuel fire burnt out. This raging fire, in combination with the alternative structure design of the two main tower is what cased the collapse. Even if the FEMA report doesn't show this, this is considered the most reasonable explanation of the two tower collapses. Just my thoughts, I could be wrong. :)

Very interesting.

Very interesting yes. But you have to have a great imgnation really to think this was planed.It was a tragic day in our lives. And what is still happing today only shows how these people really hate us still.

"Anonymous" lied!

www.911blimp.net contains nothing other than sound, verifiable info (which "Anonymous" would love to discredit).

911BLIMP.net is perhaps the best 9/11 site for poking the most large holes in the false-flag legend of 9/11 in the fewest number of pages (what good is a site that takes forever to read? who would ever read it?)

OTOH, there is *much* disinfo at the sites "Anonymous" claimed were somehow "reliable", especially oilempire.us (falsely claims to tell you which sites are "bogus", but who 'appointed' Robinowitz?), 911review.com (Hoffman's 'other' site, which gatekeeps all evidence that shows that it was not "the hijacked jets" which hit the buildings), and septembereleventh.org (portal for the 911vis/911truth/911citizenswatch/deceptiondollar gatekeepers who won't talk about, for example, the doubly-incriminating "5 Pentagon video frames" -- which hoist the lying government by its own petard -- any more than will the lying U.S. govt).

BUT YOU SHOULD ALWAYS JUDGE/FILTER FOR YOURSELF, AND NEVER PERMIT "GATEKEEPERS" (as in, "Move along, Citizen; there's nothing for you to see there!") TO TELL YOU WHAT YOU DON'T NEED TO KNOW!!! (especially when they cannot tell you why!!!!!!)

The apparent reason the empty-barrel-robinowitz-loving oilempire-ish gatekeepers do not want you to visit http://911blimp.net is because it points out WHAT is wrong with the main 9/11 disinfo sites such as cooperativeresearch.org (the timeline of "Paul Thompson" [not his real name!] always begins with "caves in Afghanistan", which powerfully reinforces the govt's bogus tale which claims that we can blame 9/11 on Osama and Atta). Also whatreallyhappened.com (Mike Rivero lets Bush off the hook by labeling Bush's incriminating 9/11 witness statements as lies, despite a total lack of evidence that Bush was lying about them!!!).

When people tell you that a site is "bogus", but are unable to tell you why, such people have probably just "outed" themselves!!! (Many of them are "plane-huggers"; desperate to keep the notion that we can take the govt's word for what struck the buildings, in order to keep alive the bogus belief that we can still blame 9/11 on 'hijackers', even though we know that we cannot blame the WTC collapses on 'airplanes'!)

BTW, unlike most 911 evidence sites, 911blimp.net relies primarily on videos it recorded (VHS) off-the-air (this includes the first known airing of the "flash frame" in the Naudet video that night). 911blimp.net also makes its entire 68 minute VHS recording from 9/11 available for download in DivX format.

New blog launched to expose the disreputable and dishonest American Bulldog breeders and kennels.

If you have a "horror story" when dealing with an American Bull Dog breeder or kennel PLEASE share it with us at http://americanbulldogblog.blogspot.com/

By doing so you will be providing valuable information to potential puppy buyers and help them avoid similar situation.

Things like this never cease to amaze me. I always take an interest in the other side to the story we don't seemingly hear. And yet we surely have the right to? Before reading your writings and references, I'd never considered that the damage etc. was caused by more than the two planes. I've certainly had my eyes opened.
Thanks.
Take care. x

I knew this facts already. And of course there are many more of them, and a lot of fair websites around that explain them. They're creepy facts and they keep being creepy every new time I read about them. Well, let's say it (People as Gore Vidal said it just right after september 2001): 11/9 and possibly all the war-on-terrorism it's all an inside job. White House, CIA, Western secret agencies, Mossad, arabic, oriental accomplices and God knows who else made it.
Will they ever pay for it? May be. May be not.
It gives me the creep to think that maybe even in one hundred years from now the truth wont' be revealed.

You're doing fine with this blog anyway. I'll keep read it. (Too bad for the ads though)-

Great stuff! I've been reading your articles for a while now and I like them because they go into more depth on someof the issues that come up on The Rudicus Report.

I espcially like what you did here with this article - good compilation - you should send it over to Raw Story - I bet they'd get a kick out of it.

We should trade links, I think our respective readers would enjoy each others sites. Keep up the great work!

This is fascinating ... I need to blogmark you and come back, then really delve in.

Are you implying that the persons responsible for the attacks of September 11 could have been agents of the United States government willing to sacrifice their lives in the name of George W. Bush and Karl Rove, conspirators?

I love your blog. You've made some incredible arguments and stated clear and concise facts. Here's hoping the Men In Black don't show up on your door and "disappear" you.

Ok, Mulder.

makes you think, dont it?

corpodibacco,

I decided to take out many of the advertisements. Now, there are only three remaining. The blog should load much quicker now.

I'm thinking about doing entirely away with all advertisements, but she shall see.

I hope it loads faster for you now.

Your writing is very well researched, and for that I applaud you. The manner in which you have attempted to gainsay the official version of the incident is remarkable, as also very cogent, and really lives up to the true purpose of the World Wide Web, which is to present different versions of the same basic truth. Keep up the good work.

I have a question~ if this were true, were the people who flew into the building, who were they working for? the government? cia? What would be the point and the gain?

Very interested in your blog, will definately blogmark!

Your points seem very well thought out and address some good points. The picture evidence and links give credence to what you're saying. Good post.

izabella,

Ask yourself? Who has gained the most from 9/11? The military industrial complex, including, George W. Bush's Carlyle Group, Cheney's Halliburton, and George Schultz's Bechtel.

And dont forget about their Big Oil friends who will make out nicely with the newly formed Iraqi government and the new Afghanistan oil and natural gas pipeline. (Did you know that Afghan president Hamid Kharzai is a former Unocal executive? So was Condoleeza Rice, by the way.)

The CIA is merely the "muscle" for our gangsters in office. They get to use our military, CIA, and the rest of our government agencies to further their own causes. Its quite a nice scam. And its been going on for over a hundred years.

Do a google search for the name General Smedley Butler. And remember, General Butler was the highest decorated General this country had ever seen at the time of his retirement. After he retired, he talked a lot about how the US military was used.

Brilliant. Thank you for this.

Very interesting article. Keep it up.

Can't say I agree, but fascinating stuff nonetheless.

Very intresting and you use facts to back it up. You have hlped open my eyes. Like the rest of you blog too by the way.

The BushCo/NWO is behind all of this. The people need to say enough is enough!

They planned to manipulate public opinion for a war in Iraq using terrorism and the threat of WMD's and that is exactly what they did.
Now it's time for the American people to stand up and be counted.
They've got to be held accountable by all that's left-WE, THE PEOPLE!

Have you considered the different architectural skeletal structure of the Twin Towers in their collapse?

Mr. Shott,

But of course. In fact, thats what makes the collapse even more curious. There have been a few reports based upon theories (after all, since the evidence was destroyed, all we are left with in terms of the structural analysis is deduction) conducted by structural engineers which completely discredit the "pancake theory".

Also, the very fact that the towers collapsed at terminal velocity further leads one to believe that towers did not come down due to mere fire.

Check this out. Its simply a very layman's approach to understanding the free fall problem:

http://911blimp.net/prf_FreeFallPhysics.shtml

the best article on the collapses is at

http://911research.wtc7.net

the "blimp" site is one that is best to avoid, there's a mixture of real and fake information there

for other reliable sites

911review.com
cooperativeresearch.org
fromthewilderness.com
oilempire.us
ratical.org
septembereleventh.org

there are others, but these are among the very best and most careful

lots of claims are not real -- yes, there was complicity, but there's also a big smokescreen of disinfo surrounding the evidence that is hard to separate from real material that can be independently verified

wow...conspiracy or not, i guessed if there is anohter side of the story, it is worth reading/hearing!

Holy horseshit, do I ever love this site. You'd better believe I blogrolled it. Keep up the good (but creepy - the facts about WTC 7 are still giving me goosebumps) work!

First thing I thought when I was watching the towers fall was what an incredibly well orchestrated controlled demolition and wondered who did it because the planes clearly didn't. Then I was shocked that people threw aside logic so quickly...a handy thing for an administration with an agenda. Yes, of course Bush didn't seem surprised to "get the news" about the attacks. How can you be surprised about something you already know? Loved your blog.

Reopen 911 website offers a ton of info not covered by the 9-11 Commission Report.

A Free DVD is offered with much of the information listed in this post.

I agree with the 7th tower analyst to the extent it is explained. It leads to the conclusion that many of New York's buildings might have a self-destruct bombs in place so that the buildings can be destroyed orderly before they can topple to the side and therefore taking out even more buildings.
I disagree that this is what happened with the two man towers. They did not fall straight down. They started collapsing from near the impact points and fell outwards and inwards at the same time. Plus, I've seen the fire department video that was taken in the ground floor the first tower when the collapse started, and there are not signs of cutter explosions. Plus, to my knowledge, none of the firefighters that did survive in the lower underground levels reported anything that could be called a cutter explosion. Basically, when I watched the two towers fall live, I didn't see anything organized about it at all. Also, it wasn't the fuel fire that is blamed for the collapse, it is the massive paper fire the started burning from the fuel fire, and it was the paper fire that picked up momentum long after the fuel fire burnt out. This raging fire, in combination with the alternative structure design of the two main tower is what cased the collapse. Even if the FEMA report doesn't show this, this is considered the most reasonable explanation of the two tower collapses. Just my thoughts, I could be wrong. :)

Very interesting.

Very interesting yes. But you have to have a great imgnation really to think this was planed.It was a tragic day in our lives. And what is still happing today only shows how these people really hate us still.

"Anonymous" lied!

www.911blimp.net contains nothing other than sound, verifiable info (which "Anonymous" would love to discredit).

911BLIMP.net is perhaps the best 9/11 site for poking the most large holes in the false-flag legend of 9/11 in the fewest number of pages (what good is a site that takes forever to read? who would ever read it?)

OTOH, there is *much* disinfo at the sites "Anonymous" claimed were somehow "reliable", especially oilempire.us (falsely claims to tell you which sites are "bogus", but who 'appointed' Robinowitz?), 911review.com (Hoffman's 'other' site, which gatekeeps all evidence that shows that it was not "the hijacked jets" which hit the buildings), and septembereleventh.org (portal for the 911vis/911truth/911citizenswatch/deceptiondollar gatekeepers who won't talk about, for example, the doubly-incriminating "5 Pentagon video frames" -- which hoist the lying government by its own petard -- any more than will the lying U.S. govt).

BUT YOU SHOULD ALWAYS JUDGE/FILTER FOR YOURSELF, AND NEVER PERMIT "GATEKEEPERS" (as in, "Move along, Citizen; there's nothing for you to see there!") TO TELL YOU WHAT YOU DON'T NEED TO KNOW!!! (especially when they cannot tell you why!!!!!!)

The apparent reason the empty-barrel-robinowitz-loving oilempire-ish gatekeepers do not want you to visit http://911blimp.net is because it points out WHAT is wrong with the main 9/11 disinfo sites such as cooperativeresearch.org (the timeline of "Paul Thompson" [not his real name!] always begins with "caves in Afghanistan", which powerfully reinforces the govt's bogus tale which claims that we can blame 9/11 on Osama and Atta). Also whatreallyhappened.com (Mike Rivero lets Bush off the hook by labeling Bush's incriminating 9/11 witness statements as lies, despite a total lack of evidence that Bush was lying about them!!!).

When people tell you that a site is "bogus", but are unable to tell you why, such people have probably just "outed" themselves!!! (Many of them are "plane-huggers"; desperate to keep the notion that we can take the govt's word for what struck the buildings, in order to keep alive the bogus belief that we can still blame 9/11 on 'hijackers', even though we know that we cannot blame the WTC collapses on 'airplanes'!)

BTW, unlike most 911 evidence sites, 911blimp.net relies primarily on videos it recorded (VHS) off-the-air (this includes the first known airing of the "flash frame" in the Naudet video that night). 911blimp.net also makes its entire 68 minute VHS recording from 9/11 available for download in DivX format.

New blog launched to expose the disreputable and dishonest American Bulldog breeders and kennels.

If you have a "horror story" when dealing with an American Bull Dog breeder or kennel PLEASE share it with us at http://americanbulldogblog.blogspot.com/

By doing so you will be providing valuable information to potential puppy buyers and help them avoid similar situation.

Add a comment

 
All Bark. No Bite.
The Bulldog Manifesto


Headlines from the Impeachment 

Blogosphere
Provided by First Sustainable
Add this box to your site
Add your feed to this box




The Dog House